ArticlePloS one2026
Parental attitudes to randomised controlled trials in primary dental care: A qualitative study.
Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundA clinical paedodontic randomised controlled trial (FiCTION) provided the opportunity to explore recruitment and retention challenges in The National Health Service (NHS) primary dental care settings. PURPOSE: To investigate parental attitudes towards their child's participation in a dental randomised controlled trial (RCT).
methodsParents whose child(ren) (aged 3-7 years) were participants in a dental RCT or who had been screened for the trial but did not participate were asked to consent to be contacted regarding completing a questionnaire and a semi-structured face-to-face qualitative interview. Using a purposive, maximum variation sampling strategy a subsample of parents who had completed the questionnaire study completed an interview. Data were coded using NVivo and the Framework Method of thematic analysis applied.
resultsThe 18 parents consenting to an interview indicated positive attitudes towards research in primary dental care. There were no noticeable contrasting views of good dental health, or perceptions of facilitators and barriers thereof, between parents whose child(ren) were FiCTION participants and those whose child(ren) were not. Research involvement did not appear to be a major incentive to attend a particular practice, and while parents viewed research-active dental practices favourably, they did not always understand why their practice was research-active (especially for those not participating in FiCTION). Most FiCTION parents felt comfortable with the concept of trial withdrawal or requesting a change in treatment arm. However, parents did not always have complete knowledge or understanding of the research study in which they had been invited to participate. While FiCTION parents had overall greater understanding of research, concepts such as randomisation were hard for most parents to grasp.
conclusionsParents valued dental research in primary care but perceived it as complex and challenging. Further research should explore the best methods to achieve engagement with patients in primary dental care research.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.