ArticlePloS one2026
Beyond writing machines: A Kano model analysis of researchers' hierarchical needs for AIGC services across the research lifecycle.
Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- A needs assessment survey for improving library support for chiropractic faculty research.The Journal of chiropractic education · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The proliferation of AI-Generated Content (AIGC) tools presents both opportunities and challenges for the academic service ecosystem. However, a systematic understanding of researchers' multifaceted demands for AIGC functionalities remains underdeveloped, hindering the strategic design and optimization of these services. This study addresses this gap by investigating three core questions: (1) What specific AIGC service functions do researchers desire across the research lifecycle? (2) How can these needs be categorized hierarchically? (3) What is their relative importance in influencing user satisfaction? Employing an exploratory sequential mixed-methods design, this research first identified a comprehensive list of 15 service demands through semi-structured interviews with 45 expert researchers (N = 45). Subsequently, these demands were prioritized through a large-scale questionnaire survey involving 412 researchers (N = 412), utilizing the Kano model and Importance-Performance Analysis. The results reveal a clear hierarchy of needs: we identified three must-be attributes (e.g., data security, citation accuracy), seven one-dimensional attributes (e.g., automated literature summarization, language polishing), and five attractive attributes (e.g., generating novel research hypotheses, smart journal recommendation). These findings provide a detailed framework for AIGC service development and offer an evidence-based model for academic institutions to prioritize resource allocation, thereby enhancing the value and adoption of AIGC in scholarly research.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.