ArticlePloS one2026
Communication competences of multiple sclerosis neurologists during advance care planning conversations: A multi-observer study.
Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
18 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe ConCure-SM intervention [ISRCTN48527663] consists of an advance care planning (ACP) training program for neurologists/other professionals caring for people with progressive multiple sclerosis (PwPMS). We assessed the communication competences of ACP-trained neurologists who participated in the trial.
methodsEighteen ACP conversations were audio-recorded. After each conversation, participants (PwPMS, significant others [SOs], and neurologists) rated the neurologist's communication skills using dedicated versions of the Quality of Communication questionnaire (QOC). Independent observers assessed the conversations using the Observing Patient Involvement in Shared Decision Making (SDM; OPTION), and the Verona Coding Definitions of Emotional Sequences (VR-CoDES).
resultsMean duration of the ACP conversations was 62.7 minutes. Neurologists (5/7 women) were 30-62-year-old. PwPMS mean age was 61.8 years, 39% were women. Mean QOC scores (distinguished in general communication and end-of-life communication; 0-100 scale) were 92.4, 90.1 respectively, according to PwPMS; 95.2, 94.3 according to SOs. Mean neurologists' self-reported QOC score (0-100 scale) was 69.5. Mean OPTION score (0-100 scale) was 48.4. PwPMS expressed a median of 8.5 cues (hints to emotion) and 3.0 concerns (explicit expressions of emotion) per conversation. Neurologists provided space to 59% of cues and 73% of concerns. A quarter of cues/concerns contained figurative expressions or metaphors to express concerns or as signals of emotional distress. Moreover, 12% of expressions were coded as positive emotional statements (i.e., expressions indicating hope, confidence, and positive wishes).
conclusionsNeurologists' communication skills during ACP conversations were rated as high using the QOC by both PwPMS and SOs, while neurologists rated their own skills more critically. Neurologists' SDM competences were moderate, but higher compared to two published studies on MS consultations. Qualitative and quantitative analysis of ACP conversation transcripts indicate that ACP can evoke many emotions. In most instances neurologists provided space for the PwPMS to elaborate on affective expressions.
trial registrationISRCTN48527663.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.