ArticlePloS one2026
Lessons learned from manual curation of thousands of gene models in the nematode Pristionchus pacificus.
Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Continuous developments in sequencing technologies have led to the generation of chromosome-scale genome assemblies across the whole tree of life, but our ability to annotate genomes has lacked behind. One major problem consists in the fact that typically not all genes are expressed at detectable levels at any given life stage or environment. Therefore, available transcriptome data needs to be complemented by gene prediction programs and protein homology evidence. However, how to optimally combine these different data types is not well understood. Here, we present a case study, where we community curated gene annotations of the Pristionchus pacificus strain RSC011. By incorporation of new Iso-seq and RNA-seq data and genome-wide screening, we identified and corrected more than 7,500 (~24%) gene models. While the improved gene annotation for the RSC011 strain will be useful for the P. pacificus community, our study reveals several gene annotation problems that may affect data from other species. Among these, we identified assembly errors, artificial transcript fusions resulting from overlapping genes and polycistronic RNAs, falsely called open reading frames, and error propagation based on homology data as frequent sources of gene annotation errors. Thus, our findings may be helpful in guiding future efforts to annotate genomes across different taxonomic groups.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.