ArticleHealth economics review2026
Harnessing oil revenues for sustainable development: evaluating Brazil's "royalties' law" and its impact on healthcare.
Article in Health economics review, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
This study evaluates the impact of Law No. 12,858/2013, known as the "royalties law", on the allocation of resources for healthcare in Brazilian municipalities that receive oil revenues. This law, which has not been empirically evaluated before, changes the way oil revenues are allocated and mandates that a portion be directed to healthcare and education to promote sustainable development and intergenerational equity. Using the difference-in-differences method combined with propensity score matching, we investigate whether there was an increase in expenditures on primary healthcare and whether this resulted in improvements in both primary care and more complex healthcare services. To achieve this goal, we use a large set of disaggregated health indicators, such as expenditures on primary care, child vaccination, infant mortality, hospital admissions, and inpatient mortality. The results indicate that the royalties law is associated with a positive impact on healthcare services in the benefiting municipalities. The increase in primary care investments in the treated municipalities is associated with the improvement of this sector, strengthening preventive actions and reducing the need for more complex services. More effective monitoring of pregnant women and expanded child vaccination contributed to lower infant mortality rates. In medium and high complexity healthcare services, there was a reduction in hospital admissions and inpatient mortality. This suggests that strengthening primary care can optimize the functioning of the entire healthcare system. Furthermore, it is important for policymakers in Brazil to reassess the minimum 15% of own revenue that municipalities must allocate to healthcare. The robustness of our conclusions is confirmed by a triple difference model, which indicates that the observed effects are not driven by pre-existing trends or other confounding factors. Additionally, our findings are not sensitive to tests for parallel trends, falsification in treatment assignment, or variables unrelated to primary care. This study contributes to understanding how natural resource revenues can be used to promote sustainable development and improve public health. It also offers valuable insights for policymakers in resource-rich countries, helping to design effective strategies to manage revenues and invest in human capital sustainably.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.