ArticleTranslational stroke research2026
Accounting for Truncation Artifacts in Angiographic Perfusion.
Article in Translational stroke research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Unlocking perfusion metrics from routine digital subtraction angiography could transform how neurovascular disease is managed. Truncation artifact, defined as premature termination of image acquisition, is a key source of error in CT and MR perfusion imaging. However, length requirements for deriving perfusion metrics from angiography remain undefined. This study investigates the minimum image acquisition length required for interpreting mean transit time from digital subtraction angiography. We analyzed 55 outpatient angiograms performed for surveillance an average of 687 days after aneurysmal rupture. Truncation artifact was simulated by progressively shortening the angiography runs after bolus arrival. A gamma-variate function was used to assess if extrapolation of the truncated data could approximate full length acquisitions. Extrapolation of the truncated datasets with the gamma-variate function produced highly reliable estimates of the mean transit time with at least seven seconds of post-bolus data (mean difference between truncated/extrapolated MTT and original MTT 0.003 ± 0.047 s, mean ± SD). The fraction of pixels fit by the gamma-variate function was also sensitive to truncation and at least seven seconds of data was required to fit > 90% of the pixels. These findings provide a framework for evaluating the adequacy of image acquisition time and lay the foundation for retrospective perfusion analysis using digital subtraction angiography.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41817920What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.