ArticleJournal of interventional cardiac electrophysiology : an international journal of arrhythmias and pacing2026
Efficacy and safety of a novel pulsed field ablation system in paroxysmal atrial fibrillation.
Article in Journal of interventional cardiac electrophysiology : an international journal of arrhythmias and pacing, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
20 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundPulsed field ablation (PFA) is an emerging innovative technology for treating paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (PAF), featured by its superior speed, accuracy, and reduced risk to adjacent tissues. The NOVA-AF study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of a novel PFA system equipped with two PFA catheters: a circular PFA catheter and a linear PFA catheter integrating contact force-sensing capability, in patients with symptomatic PAF.
methodsThis prospective, multicenter, single-arm study enrolled 161 patients with symptomatic PAF from seven medical centers in China. The composite primary effectiveness endpoint was defined as freedom from atrial tachyarrhythmia recurrence, device failure, multiple ablations during the blanking period, or antiarrhythmic drug failure during the evaluation period. The primary safety endpoint was the incidence of major adverse events (MAEs) related to the devices or procedures within three months of the procedure.
resultsAll the ablated lesions (100%) were acutely electrically isolated. No patients underwent repeat ablation during the 90-day blanking period. The 12-month Kaplan–Meier estimates for primary effectiveness success and clinical success (absence of symptomatic atrial fibrillation recurrence) were 83.0% (95% confidence interval, 76.2%–88.0%) and 94.9%, respectively. No MAEs occurred.
conclusionThis novel PFA system is effective and safe for the ablation treatment of patients with symptomatic PAF. REGISTRY: Chinese Clinical Trial Registry ( www.chictr.org.cn ), TRN: ChiCTR2400091941, Registration date: Nov 6 2024 (retrospectively registered).
Indexed as
Identifiers
41817907What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.