Trial reportClinical oral investigations2026
Comparison of the temporomandibular joint-space volume after mandibular reconstruction using patient-specific plate-positioning guides and the conventional method: a randomized controlled trial.
Trial report in Clinical oral investigations, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesThis study aimed to compare pre- to postoperative changes in temporomandibular joint-space (TMJ-space) volumes after mandibular reconstruction using patient-specific plate-positioning guides (PPG) versus the conventional method (CM). MATERIALS AND
methodsThis single-center, non-blinded, randomized clinical trial included 36 adults who underwent mandibular reconstruction using pre-bent plates, allocated 1:1 to the PPG or CM groups. Preoperative and 1-week postoperative computed tomography images obtained in maximum intercuspation (habitual intercuspal position) were three-dimensionally segmented and analyzed using predefined craniomaxillofacial reference planes to quantify TMJ-space volumes, including the total, anterior-, posterior-, medial-, and lateral-compartment volumes. The primary endpoint was the absolute volume change on the operated side, and the secondary endpoints were occlusion-standardized changes. Eligibility excluded Brown classes Ic, IIc, and IVc (disarticulation defects); there were no restrictions on defect size. Paired t/Wilcoxon tests were used for within-group comparisons and Welch/U tests for between-group comparisons, with 95% CIs.
resultsAt 1 week, for absolute changes, |Δ|TSV favored PPG (PPG–CM = − 205.59 mm³; 95% CI − 360.86 to − 50.33; p = 0.012) and |Δ|LSV likewise favored PPG (PPG–CM = − 92.38 mm³; 95% CI − 183.17 to − 1.59; p = 0.046). For occlusion-standardized changes on the operated side, all |Δ|TSV (PPG–CM = − 166.12 mm³; 95% CI − 230.39 to − 73.19; p = 0.002), |Δ|PSV (PPG–CM = − 123.37 mm³; 95% CI − 211.03 to − 63.02; p = 0.003), and |Δ|LSV (PPG–CM = -71.44 mm³; 95% CI -129.92 to -12.95; p = 0.019) favored PPG, whereas no between-group differences were significant on the non-operated side. Operative time was shorter with PPG (median 120.5 vs. 160.5 min; p = 0.001).
conclusionsPPG-assisted reconstruction resulted in smaller absolute and occlusion-standardized changes in TMJ-space volumes than CM, suggesting reduced variation in joint-space geometry and more stable early postoperative condyle–fossa relationships as inferred from joint-space measurements. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Smaller alterations in TMJ-space volumes together with greater operative efficiency suggest that PPG may help maintain more consistent early postoperative TMJ-space geometry after mandibular reconstruction; future studies incorporating direct three-dimensional analyses of condylar position and rotation are warranted.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41817878What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.