Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41817772›Full record

ReviewMikrochimica acta2026

Analytical challenges in the assessment of intestinal fate, uptake and crossing of food-relevant nanomaterials.

Francesco Cubadda, Sofia Favero, Chiara Civitelli, Francesca De Battistis, Andrea Raggi, Francesca Ferraris

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Mikrochimica acta, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Francesco CubaddaDepartment Food Safety, Nutrition and Veterinary Public Health, Istituto Superiore di Sanità - Italian National Institute of Health, Viale Regina Elena, Rome, 299 00161, Italy. francesco.cubadda@iss.it.
Sofia FaveroDepartment Food Safety, Nutrition and Veterinary Public Health, Istituto Superiore di Sanità - Italian National Institute of Health, Viale Regina Elena, Rome, 299 00161, Italy.
Chiara CivitelliDepartment Food Safety, Nutrition and Veterinary Public Health, Istituto Superiore di Sanità - Italian National Institute of Health, Viale Regina Elena, Rome, 299 00161, Italy.
Francesca De BattistisDepartment Food Safety, Nutrition and Veterinary Public Health, Istituto Superiore di Sanità - Italian National Institute of Health, Viale Regina Elena, Rome, 299 00161, Italy.
Andrea RaggiDepartment Food Safety, Nutrition and Veterinary Public Health, Istituto Superiore di Sanità - Italian National Institute of Health, Viale Regina Elena, Rome, 299 00161, Italy.
Francesca FerrarisDepartment Food Safety, Nutrition and Veterinary Public Health, Istituto Superiore di Sanità - Italian National Institute of Health, Viale Regina Elena, Rome, 299 00161, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Characterising the fate of nanoparticles in the gastrointestinal tract as well as their uptake and crossing through the intestinal epithelium is essential for nanomaterials used in food-related applications. In chemico, in vitro and in vivo studies allow to simulate the human digestion process, assess transport across the intestinal barrier, and characterise the absorption and biodistribution of nanoparticles after oral exposure, respectively. However, these studies pose substantial analytical challenges. These include selecting the appropriate technique for the different physicochemical properties to be measured, dealing with complex sample matrices, distinguishing the particles of interest from any other interfering nanozised entity, discriminating the particulate fraction from any possible soluble (ionic or molecular) counterpart. The present review addresses these challenges by first providing an overview of the measurement techniques available for physicochemical characterisation and then examining the analytical strategies applied in the existing studies, from sample preparation protocols to the analytical measurement approaches, focusing on the information delivered, advantages and limitations. Emphasis is given to the combination of complementary analytical techniques addressing both the mass concentration and the size distribution of the particulate fraction, with special focus on mass spectrometry (MS)- and electron microscopy (EM)-based techniques. Crucial aspects such as dispersion protocols, analytical artefacts, development of approaches for complex and less studied organic nanomaterials are addressed. Based on the provided critical overview, a comprehensive multi-method analytical strategy to deal with these demanding physicochemical measurements is outlined.

Indexed as

Food AnalysisIntestinal MucosaNanostructuresAnimalsHumansMass SpectrometryElectron microscopyGastro-intestinal digestionICP-MSIntestinal absorptionNanoparticlesParticle transportPhysicochemical characterisation

Identifiers

PMID41817772
PMCPMC12982283

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.