ReviewMikrochimica acta2026
Analytical challenges in the assessment of intestinal fate, uptake and crossing of food-relevant nanomaterials.
Review in Mikrochimica acta, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Characterising the fate of nanoparticles in the gastrointestinal tract as well as their uptake and crossing through the intestinal epithelium is essential for nanomaterials used in food-related applications. In chemico, in vitro and in vivo studies allow to simulate the human digestion process, assess transport across the intestinal barrier, and characterise the absorption and biodistribution of nanoparticles after oral exposure, respectively. However, these studies pose substantial analytical challenges. These include selecting the appropriate technique for the different physicochemical properties to be measured, dealing with complex sample matrices, distinguishing the particles of interest from any other interfering nanozised entity, discriminating the particulate fraction from any possible soluble (ionic or molecular) counterpart. The present review addresses these challenges by first providing an overview of the measurement techniques available for physicochemical characterisation and then examining the analytical strategies applied in the existing studies, from sample preparation protocols to the analytical measurement approaches, focusing on the information delivered, advantages and limitations. Emphasis is given to the combination of complementary analytical techniques addressing both the mass concentration and the size distribution of the particulate fraction, with special focus on mass spectrometry (MS)- and electron microscopy (EM)-based techniques. Crucial aspects such as dispersion protocols, analytical artefacts, development of approaches for complex and less studied organic nanomaterials are addressed. Based on the provided critical overview, a comprehensive multi-method analytical strategy to deal with these demanding physicochemical measurements is outlined.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.