Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41817770›Full record

ReviewChromosome research : an international journal on the molecular, supramolecular and evolutionary aspects of chromosome biology2026

Decoding Cdk1 control: from mitotic thresholds to meiotic specificity.

Sandra A Touati

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Chromosome research : an international journal on the molecular, supramolecular and evolutionary aspects of chromosome biology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Sandra A TouatiInstitut Jacques Monod, Université Paris Cité, CNRS, F-75013, Paris, France. sandra.touati@ijm.fr.

Funding

Agence Nationale de la Recherche (ANR) ANR-21-CE13-0026the Fondation ARC pour la Recherche sur le Cancer (ARC) ARCPJA12020060002043
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The eukaryotic cell cycle is one of the most fundamental biological processes, ensuring the accurate duplication and segregation of the genome during mitosis. Decades of research across model systems have shown that this process is orchestrated by a family of protein kinases known as cyclin-dependent kinases (Cdks). Together with their cyclin partners, Cdks act as master regulators of cell division, coordinating DNA replication, chromosome segregation, and cytokinesis with remarkable precision. The discovery of Cdks and cyclins in yeast and sea urchins, celebrated with the Nobel Prize of Hartwell, Hunt, and Nurse (awarded in 2001), established the conceptual framework for understanding how oscillations in kinase activities drive cell cycle progression in a unidirectional and irreversible manner. Over the past thirty years, a central question has been whether cell cycle control relies primarily on the quantitative level of Cdk1 activity or whether distinct qualitative functions of cyclin-Cdk1 complexes ensure the correct ordering of events. Addressing this question required new genetic and biochemical tools capable of controlling Cdk1 activity with high temporal resolution and specificity. A turning point came in 2000 with the development of the analogue-sensitive Cdk1 allele by the Shokat laboratory. This approach replaced classical temperature-sensitive alleles with a version of Cdk1 that can be selectively inhibited by bulky ATP analogues. Beyond specific inhibition, the system was soon adapted to directly label and identify Cdk1 substrates, coupling chemical genetics with the emerging power of mass spectrometry. This review outlines the conceptual frameworks of quantitative and qualitative models of Cdk1 control. It also highlights how these ideas have been experimentally dissected, tracing the development of the Cdk1 Shokat system and advances from synthetic biology and phosphoproteomics in decoding phosphorylation logic, and how these concepts apply to meiosis. These studies draw primarily on budding yeast and fission yeast which have a single Cdk, making them convenient models for studying core principles of cell cycle regulation. Key insights from vertebrates are also integrated to illustrate principles that extend to other eukaryotes.

Indexed as

CDC2 Protein KinaseMeiosisMitosisAnimalsHumansPhosphorylationCDC2 Protein KinaseCdk1MeiosisMitosisPhosphoproteomeShokat

Identifiers

PMID41817770
PMCPMC12982290

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.