SynthesisSupportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer2026
The invisible wall: experiences of social isolation in colorectal cancer patients with ostomy-a qualitative meta-synthesis.
Synthesis in Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Body image and its influencing factors in colorectal cancer patients with a stoma: a latent profile analysis.Frontiers in public health · 2026Article
- Existential distress and social alienation in adolescents with allergic rhinitis: the serial mediating roles of psychological inflexibility and experiential avoidance.Frontiers in public health · 2026Article
- Bidirectional longitudinal associations between low anterior resection syndrome and stigma in patients with postoperative LARS: a cross-lagged panel study.Frontiers in public health · 2026Article
- A scoping review on social isolation in patients with intestinal stomas.Frontiers in psychology · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
aimTo synthesize qualitative evidence on the experiences and perceptions of social isolation in colorectal cancer patients with ostomy.
methodsA systematic qualitative meta-synthesis was conducted. Nine electronic databases (PubMed, Web of Science, EBSCO, Cochrane, Scopus, CNKI, Wanfang, VIP, and CBM) were searched from inception to November 2024. Qualitative studies exploring experiences of social isolation in ostomy patients were included. Methodological quality was assessed using the CASP checklist. Data were analyzed via a meta-aggregative approach.
resultsEleven studies were included. Four synthesized findings were identified: (1) antecedents and multidimensional perceptions of social isolation, (2) social relationship rupture and structural transformation, (3) psychological distress and self-identity crisis, and (4) multidimensional support needs and positive adaptation. Social isolation arose from physiological limitations, self-care challenges, and stigma, leading to behavioral withdrawal, family tension, and emotional distress. Support and self-adjustment were found to facilitate coping.
conclusionsSocial isolation in ostomy patients is a multifaceted phenomenon shaped by individual, relational, and environmental factors. A comprehensive support framework involving healthcare providers, families, and communities is essential to mitigate social isolation and promote social reintegration. Future interventions should adopt dyadic or systemic approaches to address communal challenges. IMPLICATIONS FOR CANCER SURVIVORS: Ostomy patients may experience significant social isolation influenced by complex factors. Holistic, needs-based support from multiple stakeholders is crucial to facilitate adaptation and improve quality of life.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41817765What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.