Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41817733›Full record

ArticleEuropean journal of trauma and emergency surgery : official publication of the European Trauma Society2026

The pararectus approach in acetabular fracture fixation: evidence of reproducibility and learnability.

R O Schaefer, S Ivanova, C S Leibold, R J Egli, H Bonel, M J B Keel, J D Bastian

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in European journal of trauma and emergency surgery : official publication of the European Trauma Society, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

R O Schaefer *Department of Orthopaedic Surgery and Traumatology, Inselspital University Hospital Bern, University of Bern, Freiburgstrasse 18, Bern, CH-3010, Switzerland.
S Ivanova *Department of Orthopaedic Surgery and Traumatology, Inselspital University Hospital Bern, University of Bern, Freiburgstrasse 18, Bern, CH-3010, Switzerland. Silviya.Ivanova@insel.ch.
C S LeiboldDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery and Traumatology, Inselspital University Hospital Bern, University of Bern, Freiburgstrasse 18, Bern, CH-3010, Switzerland.
R J EgliDepartment of Diagnostic, Interventional and Pediatric Radiology, Inselspital University Hospital Bern, University of Bern, Freiburgstrasse 18, Bern, CH-3010, Switzerland.
H BonelDepartment of Radiology Lindenhof, Bremgartenstrasse 117, Bern, CH-3001, Switzerland.
M J B KeelTrauma Center Hirslanden, Clinic Hirslanden Zurich, Medical School University of Zurich, Witellikerstrasse 40, Zurich, CH-8032, Switzerland.
J D BastianDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery and Traumatology, Inselspital University Hospital Bern, University of Bern, Freiburgstrasse 18, Bern, CH-3010, Switzerland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThe Pararectus approach is an anterior intrapelvic exposure introduced by Keel et al. for the management of anterior acetabular fractures. While its safety and effectiveness have been demonstrated, evidence regarding the learnability of this technically demanding method remains under discussion. This study compares the first fifty consecutive eligible cases treated by the approach's inventor (group A) with the first fifty independent cases performed by a surgeon without prior acetabular subspecialization (group B).

methodsConsecutive patients representing the first 50 Pararectus cases for displaced acetabular fractures in group A (2009-2013) and group B (2017-2021) were included. Baseline demographics were comparable except for age (64 vs. 73 years, p = 0.001) and trauma mechanism (high-energy trauma more frequent in group A, 46% vs. 12%; p < 0.001). Group A was treated using manually contoured reconstruction and buttress plates, whereas group B was managed with a standardized traction-table setup and a precontoured suprapectineal plate system (p < 0.001). Operative time, intraoperative blood loss, intra- and postoperative complications, CT-based reduction quality, reoperations ≤ 30 days, and conversion to total hip arthroplasty (THA) ≤ 24 months were analyzed.

resultsThe analyzed outcomes demonstrated comparable operative parameters between both groups: (i) Operative time averaged 172 min (range 50-339) in group A and 165 min (90-266) in group B (p = 0.19), (ii) intraoperative blood loss was 1000 ml (250-6000) in group A and 900 ml (200-4500) in group B (p = 0.09), (iii) intraoperative complications occurred in 5/50 (10%) in group A compared with 3/50 (6%) in group B (p = 0.71), (iv) CT-based reduction quality was anatomical in 36/50 (72%) in group A and 31/50 (62%) in group B, imperfect in 14/50 (28%) vs. 16/50 (32%), and poor in 0/50 (0%) vs. 3/50 (6%) (overall p = 0.17), (v) postoperative complications occurred in 7/50 (14%) in group A and 5/50 (10%) in group B (p = 0.75), (vi) of these, reoperations ≤ 30 days were required in 7/50 (14%) in group A and 1/50 (2%) in group B (p = 0.066), (vii) conversion to THA ≤ 24 months was required in 5/50 (10%) in group A and 2/50 (6%) in group B (p = 0.70), with a mean time to THA of 13.8 months vs. 5.8 months (p = 0.22).

conclusionOperative parameters, reduction quality, postoperative complications, and conversion to THA ≤ 24 months were comparable between the two surgeons. These findings indicate that, within a standardized workflow and instrumentation, the Pararectus approach can be applied safely and reproducibly even during the early phase of independent practice.

Indexed as

AcetabulumFracture Fixation, InternalFractures, BoneAgedArthroplasty, Replacement, HipBone PlatesClinical CompetenceFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedOperative TimePostoperative ComplicationsReproducibility of ResultsRetrospective StudiesAcetabular fractureApproachIntrapelvicLearning curveOsteosynthesisPararectusTraining

Identifiers

PMID41817733
PMCPMC12982213

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.