ArticleEuropean radiology2026
FLAIR vascular hyperintensity: association with infarction and vascular lesion burden in patients with middle cerebral artery stenosis.
Article in European radiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesFluid-attenuated inversion recovery (FLAIR) vascular hyperintensity (FVH) is a marker of hemodynamic impairment linked to poor outcomes. However, its underlying vascular pathology remains unclear. We aimed to evaluate the relationships between FVH, infarction, and vascular lesion burden, and explore whether infarction and vascular lesion burden can discriminate FVH presence and burden. MATERIALS AND
methodsA total of 253 consecutive patients with middle cerebral artery lesions who underwent vessel wall imaging were retrospectively enrolled. Multivariate logistic regressions were performed to identify discriminatory factors for FVH presence or burden; area under the curve (AUC), sensitivity and specificity assessed the discriminatory ability of combined models.
resultsInfarction, severe stenosis, and vascular wall marked enhancement were independently associated with FVH (ORs 2.995, 4.074, 2.141; all p < 0.05). Infarction, severe stenosis, max wall thickness, and max vascular lesion length were independently correlated with higher FVH burden (ORs 2.966, 8.785, 2.344, 1.049; all p < 0.05). The combined model (infarction + severe stenosis + marked enhancement) discriminated FVH presence with an excellent AUC of 0.803 (95% CI: 0.749-0.850, p < 0.001; sensitivity 76.6%; specificity 76.7%). The combined model (infarction + severe stenosis + max wall thickness + max vascular lesion length) discriminated higher FVH burden with an AUC of 0.801 (95% CI: 0.746-0.848, p < 0.001; sensitivity 80.8%; specificity 70.9%).
conclusionInfarction and vascular lesion burden are key factors associated with FVH. Our findings suggest a pathophysiological link between FVH and underlying vessel wall pathology, positioning FVH as a potential integrative MRI biomarker. KEY POINTS: Question While FLAIR vascular hyperintensity (FVH) indicates hemodynamic compromise and slow collateral flow, how the underlying vascular lesion burden contributes to FVH formation remains unclear. Findings Infarction, severe stenosis, and vascular lesion burden features effectively distinguished both FVH presence and higher burden, with combined models demonstrating excellent discriminatory performance. Clinical relevance FVH may serve as a valuable and readily accessible biomarker on conventional MRI that integrates infarction and specific vascular characteristics, suggesting its potential to enhance risk stratification and guide personalized therapeutic decisions in clinical practice.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41817708What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.