ReviewCurrent psychiatry reports2026
Behavioral Health Assessments and Surgical Readiness Letters for Gender-affirming Surgery: Current Literature, Standards of Care, and Practical Guidance.
Review in Current psychiatry reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purpose of reviewBehavioral health (BH) assessments play a key role in determining surgical readiness prior to gender-affirming surgery (GAS). These assessments evaluate mental health management preoperatively, psychosocial support postoperatively, and patient understanding of upcoming procedures. When conducting BH assessments, providers may also offer resources, support, and information, as needed. The resulting documentation, often referred to as a surgical readiness letter, can provide surgeons with relevant psychosocial context, enhancing understanding of patient needs, goals, and readiness. However, there is significant procedural heterogeneity in BH assessment prior to GAS, which has yet to become a nationally standardized process. RECENT
findingsWhile evidence continues to demonstrate the significant mental and physical health benefits of GAS, protocols for preoperative BH assessments vary widely due to a lack of standardized templates and limited language in current standards of care. Describing a patient’s experience of gender incongruence remains an integral component of the BH assessment. Emerging literature emphasizes collaborative, trauma-informed approaches, shifting from a pathology-driven framework to one of informed consent and support system evaluation. There is growing recognition that assessing (1) a patient’s access to mental health care, (2) stability of social support, and (3) understanding of perioperative care and recovery is essential to an effective BH assessment. Evidence suggests that comprehensive preoperative evaluation and psychosocial readiness are associated with better postoperative mental health outcomes. Studies also highlight the impact of GAS barriers on mental health outcomes. This review article: 1) evaluates recent literature on BH assessments for GAS, 2) explores the current standards of care, emerging best practices, and ongoing challenges shaping this continually evolving field, and 3) leverages institutional knowledge from a pioneer gender-affirming care center at a major academic medical institution in order to address gaps in current guidelines, providing readers with practical, detailed insights into conducting effective BH assessments that support adult patients preoperatively and optimize outcomes postoperatively.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41817630What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.