ArticleIndian journal of ophthalmology2026
A new video recording setup in oculoplastic surgery using a magnetic neck mount and iPhone.
Article in Indian journal of ophthalmology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
To describe a novel, low-cost, and high-quality intraoperative video recording setup for oculoplastic surgery using a magnetic neck-mounted smartphone holder and iPhone with the Final Cut Camera app. A magnetic neck mount (Tianzhu Insta 360, China) and an iPhone 16 Pro Max were adapted for surgical recording by securing the holder around the binocular base of the operating microscope. The magnetically attached phone provided a stable and adjustable platform, allowing intraoperative view adjustments via the microscope's handles or foot pedal without compromising sterility. The Final Cut Camera app enabled 4K video capture with manual control of focus, exposure, and white balance. Its Live Multicam feature allowed simultaneous multi-angle recording and real-time monitoring via a compatible iPad, enabling an assistant to control framing and clarity intraoperatively. A multi-port adapter was used to support continuous power and external memory. Over six months, more than 50 oculoplastic procedures, including dacryocystorhinostomy, orbitotomy, and eyelid surgeries, were successfully recorded using this setup. All recordings were stable, centered, and of high image quality. Screenshots captured during surgery clearly depicted anatomical structures under standard operating room lighting. This smartphone-based recording method offers a simple, cost-effective, and ergonomically practical alternative to traditional surgical video systems in oculoplastic procedures. Its adaptability, ease of use, and compatibility with sterile environments make it an ideal solution for surgical documentation and teaching, especially in resource-limited settings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.