ReviewJournal of phycology2026
An updated classification of growth forms in non-geniculate coralline algae (Corallinophycidae, Rhodophyta).
Review in Journal of phycology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Unveiling coralline diversity of mesophotic rhodoliths in subtropical Japan, including new species of Sporolithon, emended genera Orientalilithon and Roseolithon (Corallinophycidae, Rhodophyta).Journal of phycology · 2026Article
- Adapting the growth-form concept to geniculate coralline algae (Corallinales, Rhodophyta).Journal of phycology · 2026Article
- An updated classification of growth forms in non-geniculate coralline algae (Corallinophycidae, Rhodophyta).Journal of phycology · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
19 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The current challenge of defining growth forms in the non-geniculate coralline red algae was addressed. Since the 19th century, those who have worked on this large and globally distributed group of algae have tried to summarize and systematically describe their growth forms. This effort resulted in a plethora of terms, which could sometimes be confusing, overlapping, and difficult to apply in the field. We reviewed the past literature to provide a coherent key to the non-geniculate coralline growth forms, incorporating the latest observations. Our revision expands the 10 currently recognized growth forms (unconsolidated, encrusting, warty, lumpy, fruticose, discoid, layered, foliose, ribbon-like, and arborescent) by redefining some of them, by reintroducing the columnar growth form, and by adding two new growth forms-convoluted and imbricate-to include recently documented specimens. This updated and refined tool better encompasses the diverse external morphologies of non-geniculate corallines. The goal was to facilitate taxonomic descriptions and to support ecological studies of non-geniculate corallines given the extreme difficulty of identifying species using only external characters.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.