Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41817034›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of gynaecology and obstetrics: the official organ of the International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics2026

Association between patient safety culture, adverse events, and essential practices during childbirth in six Brazilian maternity hospitals.

Zenewton A S Gama, Cecília Olívia Paraguai de Oliveira Saraiva, Tatyana Maria Silva de Souza Rosendo, Rose L Molina, Katherine E A Semrau, Danielle E Tuller, Megan Marx Delaney, Christopher Westgard, Lauren Bobanski, Cláudia Maria Messias and 2 more

Abstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of gynaecology and obstetrics: the official organ of the International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Zenewton A S GamaDepartment of Collective Health, Federal University of Rio Grande do Norte-UFRN, Natal, Rio Grande do Norte, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0818-9680
Cecília Olívia Paraguai de Oliveira SaraivaDepartment of Collective Health, Federal University of Rio Grande do Norte-UFRN, Natal, Rio Grande do Norte, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4225-5194
Tatyana Maria Silva de Souza RosendoDepartment of Collective Health, Federal University of Rio Grande do Norte-UFRN, Natal, Rio Grande do Norte, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0233-3119
Rose L MolinaAriadne Labs, Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard T. H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7977-7960
Katherine E A SemrauAriadne Labs, Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard T. H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8360-1391
Danielle E TullerAriadne Labs, Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard T. H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7643-5268
Megan Marx DelaneyAriadne Labs, Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard T. H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6371-8226
Christopher WestgardAriadne Labs, Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard T. H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8914-4021
Lauren BobanskiAriadne Labs, Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard T. H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0876-8271
Cláudia Maria MessiasMaternal, Child and Psychiatric Department, Fluminense Federal University, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5286-3815
Liana Carlan PadilhaUndergraduate Course in Collective Health, Federal University of Rio Grande do Norte-UFRN, Natal, Rio Grande do Norte, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0003-7449-4816
Marise Reis de FreitasGraduate Program in Quality Management in Health Services (QualiSaúde), Federal University of Rio Grande do Norte-UFRN, Natal, Rio Grande do Norte, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5679-6672

Funding

Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Cientiacute;fico e Tecnoloacute;gico 409972/2021-5
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveThis study examines whether hospitals with stronger patient safety culture more consistently follow essential birth practices and have fewer adverse outcomes for mothers and newborns and whether this evidence can guide maternity care priorities in patient safety policy.

methodsWe conducted a multicenter cross-sectional study in six public maternity hospitals in Brazil (November 2022 to February 2024). In each hospital, we measured patient safety culture using the Brazilian version of the Hospital Survey on Patient Safety Culture. From a systematic sample of 2183 births (approximately 360 per hospital), we reviewed charts to record eight essential obstetric and neonatal practices and 10 adverse outcomes. We created hospital-level composites for the practice bundle and adverse outcomes and correlated them with culture scores using Spearman coefficients (one-sided exact P-values).

resultsA total of 686 professionals responded to the survey, with a mean overall culture score of 43.6% (range: 29.5%-56.4%). "Perception of safety" and "non-punitive response to errors" were consistently low, while "management expectations," "organizational learning," and "teamwork within units" were relative strengths. Adherence was high for postpartum oxytocin (93.4%), vitamin K (95.9%), and newborn identification (91.1%), and low for partogram initiation (36.4%), birth companion (48.1%), and breastfeeding within the first hour (47.5%). Culture scores aligned positively with the practice bundle (ρ = 0.77; P = 0.072) and inversely with adverse outcomes-maternal (ρ = -0.77; P = 0.072), neonatal (ρ = -0.89; P = 0.019), and total (ρ = -0.94; P = 0.005).

conclusionFindings support pairing culture-strengthening actions with clinical bundles to promote safer childbirth and prioritize maternity services in safety policy.

Indexed as

Delivery, ObstetricHospitals, MaternityOrganizational CulturePatient SafetySafety ManagementAdultBrazilCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleGuideline AdherenceHumansInfant, NewbornParturitionPregnancySurveys and QuestionnairesBrazilmaternal healthorganizational culturepatient safety

Identifiers

PMID41817034
PMCPMC13505257

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.