Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41817003›Full record

ArticleAdvanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany)2026

Why Computational Photochemistry Is Challenging and Will Probably Remain So: A Quantum Chemist's Perspective.

Andreas Dreuw

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Limitations of MRSF-TDDFT for Applications in Photochemistry.The journal of physical chemistry letters · 2026
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Andreas DreuwInterdisciplinary Center for Scientific Computing, Heidelberg University, Heidelberg, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5862-5113

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Compared to ground-state chemistry, the theoretical description of molecular photochemistry, that is, chemical processes in electronically excited states or electronic spectra, is fundamentally more complex. Even for relatively small molecules, several open decay channels have to be considered at the same time, and thus several electronically excited states with different electronic structures need to be computed. Furthermore, the required accuracy of the employed electronic structure theory increases with the size of the studied molecule, even for a qualitative investigation of photochemical processes. They critically depend on the correct relative energies of the electronic states and the details of the underlying potential energy surfaces (PES), and with increasing molecular size, the excitation energies become smaller and smaller, and more and more electronic states lie within the error margins of most common electronic structure methods. This imposes clear size limits for tractable molecular systems and introduces an early and fast transition from highly accurate calculations to wild guessing. Computational chemistry always lives with the lazy compromise between accuracy and computational effort, and this is particularly true for computational photochemistry, as will be discussed within this perspective from the point of view of electronic structure theory.

Indexed as

computational photochemistrycomputational spectroscopyelectronic structureexcited statesquantum chemistry

Identifiers

PMID41817003
PMCPMC13073306

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.