ArticleClinical rehabilitation2026
Inspiratory muscle training for people with spinal cord injury: An implementation study.
Article in Clinical rehabilitation, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
ObjectiveAustralian and New Zealand Guidelines for the Physiotherapy Management of People with Spinal Cord Injury recommend the use of inspiratory muscle training for people with spinal cord injury and respiratory muscle weakness. The aim of this study was to evaluate if tailored implementation strategies increased provision of inspiratory muscle training by physiotherapists.DesignA pre-post implementation study with baseline, post and follow-up measures.SettingThree spinal units in Sydney, Australia.ParticipantsTwenty-one physiotherapist-participants and 68 patient-participants across three spinal units.InterventionTailored, evidence-based, multi-faceted implementation strategies to improve physiotherapists' provision of inspiratory muscle training, delivered over a 6-week period (the implementation phase).Main measuresPhysiotherapists' provision of inspiratory muscle training was measured via a standardised audit tool. Medical records were audited at baseline, immediately after the implementation phase and then two months later to determine whether patients had been provided inspiratory muscle training.ResultsNinety-four medical records were audited of 68 patient-participants over the study period. Data at baseline indicated that inspiratory muscle training was only provided to 20% of eligible patient-participants. This improved to 91% immediately post the 6-week implementation phase but reduced to 72% two months later.ConclusionsTailored, evidence-based implementation strategies increased the provision of inspiratory muscle training by physiotherapists. These strategies can be adapted to different health care settings to improve physiotherapists' provision of inspiratory muscle training for the respiratory management of people with spinal cord injury.The study was prospectively registered with the Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry (https://www.anzctr.org.au/. ACTRN: 12623001106628).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.