ArticleThe Pan African medical journal2025
A cross-sectional study on the mental health of healthcare workers treating COVID-19 positive patients in Gauteng, South Africa.
Article in The Pan African medical journal, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: the COVID-19 pandemic had a devastating impact on society, with healthcare workers (HCWs) on the frontline bearing the brunt. As such, HCWs directly involved in the diagnosis, treatment, and care of patients with COVID-19 were at risk of developing psychological distress and other mental health symptoms. The overall aim of this study was to assess mental health symptoms among HCWs treating patients exposed to COVID-19 in Gauteng, South Africa. This research was critically important to determine the physiological burden on HCWs in response to the pandemic, so that mental health responses to the pandemic by HCWs, and psychosocial support structures in place for HCWs in South Africa can be considered. Methods: a cross-sectional study was conducted among frontline HCWs in the Inner City and Johannesburg South region (region F) of Gauteng, South Africa. Data was collected through both an online and an in-person approach. All participants completed a questionnaire enquiring about their socio-demographic characteristics and mental health symptoms. The presence and severity of symptoms of depression, anxiety, and insomnia of HCWs exposed to COVID-19 were assessed using the patient health questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9), the generalised anxiety disorder-7 (GAD-7), and the insomnia severity index-7 (ISI-7). Data analysis was performed using SPSS version 26.0 statistical software. Results: a total of 234 out of 260 contacted individuals completed the survey. The majority of the participants were female (n=190, 81.2%), aged between 36 and 45 years (n=79, 33.8%), were unmarried (n=105,44.9%), and had a tertiary education (n=217, 92.7%). The majority of the participants worked in the public sector (151, 64.5%), while the minority (n=83, 35.5%) worked in the private sector. A considerable proportion of HCWs reported symptoms of depression (n=102, 43.6%), anxiety (n=105, 44.9%), and insomnia (n=70, 29.9%). It was found that there were no significant differences in symptoms of depression (X Conclusion: the prevalence of depression, anxiety, and insomnia was shown in HCWs in Gauteng, South Africa, and there were differences in perceptions of the psychosocial support systems that exist in the region between private and public sector HCWs. The results indicate that a considerable proportion of HCWs have depression, anxiety, or insomnia, with only half indicating the presence of workplace psycho-social support structures. Psycho-social support structures for HCWs need to be strengthened and made more visible.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.