ArticleJornal vascular brasileiro2025
Treatment of penetrating injuries to the retrohepatic inferior vena cava: a systematic review.
Article in Jornal vascular brasileiro, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Injuries to the retrohepatic vena cava are associated with high mortality rates and vascular control must be obtained prior to exposure. Various treatment techniques have been described, including triple hepatic vascular exclusion, atriocaval shunt, and endovascular and hybrid strategies. Objectives: To determine which of these is associated with the lowest mortality rate. Methods: A systematic literature review was conducted, guided by the Cochrane Handbook and PRISMA guidelines. The PUBMED, LILACS, Embase, Web of science, and Scopus databases were searched and Ryyan software was employed to manage the studies identified. Results: Sixteen studies were selected, reporting 96 cases, in 49 of which the patients were treated with triple hepatic exclusion, in 38 with an atriocaval shunt, and in 9 with endovascular or hybrid techniques, with the third of these groups being statistically less frequent (p < 0.0001). The mortality rate was 53.8%, with no statistically significant differences between any of the techniques studied (p = 0.9085). Conclusions: Injuries to the retrohepatic vena cava had similar mortality rates regardless of the technique employed for treatment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.