ArticleFood chemistry: X2026
Polysaccharides reinforced sesame oil body interface as 3D printing inks for dysphagia food: focusing on structural characteristics and rheological properties.
Article in Food chemistry: X, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Plant oil body-based emulsion gels as 3D printing inks with unique structures and mechanical properties hold great prospects in dysphagia-friendly foods. This study investigates the rheological properties and 3D printing characteristics of heated sesame oil body (HSOB)-based inks by blending three different anionic polysaccharides: κ-carrageenan (κ-GC), xanthan gum (XG), and gum arabic (GA). The influence of polysaccharide types on ink printing performance, rheological properties, microstructure, and moisture distribution was analyzed. The results indicate that κ-GC-HSOB ink exhibits excellent dimensional accuracy, self-supporting ability, smooth surface finish, and minimal defects. In contrast, XG-HSOB and GA-HSOB inks display rougher surface textures, structural collapse, and oil discharge. IDDSI experiments classified HSOB and GA-HSOB as Level 4 dysphagia foods, while κ-GC-HSOB and XG-HSOB were classified as Level 5. Overall, this study elucidates how different anionic polysaccharides enhance the 3D printing characteristics of HSOB-based inks, highlighting their potential for developing dysphagia-friendly food.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.