ArticleTurkish journal of medical sciences2026
Nonclassical Philadelphia-positive FISH signal patterns in CML and seven cases with variant Philadelphia.
Article in Turkish journal of medical sciences, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background/aim: Chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) is characterized by the Philadelphia chromosome (Ph), which occurs as a result of t(9;22). In 5%-10% of CML cases, variant t(9;22)s are observed. Additionally, while t(9;22) is formed, deletions can be observed in chromosomes 9 and 22. These deletions are observed more frequently in variant t(9;22). There is conflicting information in the literature about the prognostic effects of variant t(9;22) and deletions of 9q and 22q. There is also limited information about the frequency and breakpoints of other chromosomes involved in the variant t(9;22). Signal patterns other than the classical signal pattern of FISH analysis indicate deletions and variant translocations. In this study, we aimed to investigate the clinical significance of nonclassical FISH signal patterns and to determine the frequency of variant translocations. Materials and methods: Bone marrow samples from 231 newly diagnosed CML patients were analyzed by conventional cytogenetics and FISH. Results: As a result of FISH analysis, nonclassical FISH signal patterns were detected in 49/231 cases, and variant t(9;22) was detected in seven cases by conventional cytogenetics. It was determined that chromosomes 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, and 21 were involved in variant t(9;22). When cases with classical and nonclassical signal patterns were compared in terms of 6th- and 12th-month treatment responses, survival times, and treatment changes, it was found that cases with classical signal patterns had significantly higher treatment responses at the 6th month (p < 0.001). Conclusion: Because variant translocations are extremely rare and involve many different chromosomal breaks, a large number of cases are needed to clearly understand their prognostic implications. Due to the limitations of conventional cytogenetic analyses, it should be considered in patient follow-up that nonclassical FISH signal patterns indicating deletions and/or variant translocations may cause a delay in obtaining a complete cytogenetic response at the 6th month.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.