Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41816683›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in medicine2026

Perspectives of program directors regarding candidate selection for the Saudi Board of Restorative Dentistry program.

Ali Robaian AlQahtani, Mubashir Baig Mirza, Yazeed AlQahtani, Mona Tariq Aldaijy, Abdulrahman Almalki, Shahad AlBader, Rasha Alharthi, Lamya Alkheledan, Abdullah AlShehri

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Ali Robaian AlQahtaniConservative Dental Sciences, College of Dentistry, Prince Sattam Bin Abdulaziz University, Al-Kharj, Saudi Arabia.
Mubashir Baig MirzaConservative Dental Sciences, College of Dentistry, Prince Sattam Bin Abdulaziz University, Al-Kharj, Saudi Arabia.
Yazeed AlQahtaniCollege of Dentistry, Prince Sattam Bin Abdulaziz University, Al-Kharj, Saudi Arabia.
Mona Tariq AldaijyRestorative Dentistry, Ministry of Health, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Abdulrahman AlmalkiDepartment of Prosthetic Dental Sciences, College of Dentistry, Prince Sattam Bin Abdulaziz University, Al-Kharj, Saudi Arabia.
Shahad AlBaderConservative Dental Sciences, College of Dentistry, Prince Sattam Bin Abdulaziz University, Al-Kharj, Saudi Arabia.
Rasha AlharthiDepartment of Clinical Dental Science, College of Dentistry, Princess Noura Bint Abdulrahman University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Lamya AlkheledanPrivate Practice, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Abdullah AlShehriConservative Dental Sciences, College of Dentistry, Prince Sattam Bin Abdulaziz University, Al-Kharj, Saudi Arabia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Program directors (PDs) play a crucial role in selecting candidates for the Saudi Board of Restorative Dentistry (SBRD) program. However, their views on selection and possible differences in opinions based on candidate characteristics remain unelucidated. Methods: This study surveyed restorative dentistry PDs in Saudi Arabia using a pre-validated questionnaire consisting of 30 questions grouped into seven domains to gather views on the selection process for the SBRD program. Responses from 30 participants were analyzed using means and standard deviations. We examined differences in PD variables, such as sex and years of experience using Student's Results: The top preferences of the PDs were working as service residents, skill and reputation during electives, and dressing well for interviews. Electives abroad, multiple recommendation letters, and being on the dean's honor list were less important. Interview was the most favored domain (4.04 ± 0.78), followed by service and electives (4.01 ± 0.47); recommendations were the least favored (3.41 ± 0.77). While differences existed among variables, they weren't statistically significant, except for the interview domain ( Conclusion: PDs showed diverse responses to all evaluated factors. Interviews and service/electives were most preferred. Service residencies, skills/reputation during electives, and being well dressed during interviews were favored for candidate selection. However, the results should be interpreted cautiously, given the potential limitations of statistical power associated with relatively small sample size.

Indexed as

perspectivesprogram directorsresidentsrestorative dentistrySaudi Arabia

Identifiers

PMID41816683
PMCPMC12971420

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.