ReviewChemical science2026
Deep excitation afterglow luminescent probes for biomedical applications.
Review in Chemical science, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In addition to the high sensitivity, excellent spatio-temporal resolution and powerful real-time imaging capabilities, biomedical applications impose high demands on imaging techniques. Unfortunately, conventional imaging relies on the real-time excitation and suffers from limited tissue penetration. In contrast, afterglow imaging can provide continuous and deep luminescence once the probe is excited by NIR-light, X-ray or ultrasound. As such, it can effectively avoid autofluorescence and improve the imaging sensitivity and signal-to-background ratio. Moreover, X-ray-activated afterglow probes benefit from enhanced depth of penetration, thereby allowing more effective imaging of deep-seated lesions. Such advantages have attracted the interest of researchers, which should speed up the translation of biomedical afterglow research for clinical applications. With this perspective, we provided a comparative and analytical summary of the latest advances while highlighting the most promising afterglow probes. This perspective also outlines forward-looking strategies for molecular design, working mechanisms, and clinical prospects. Moreover, future challenges and research directions are discussed. As such this perspective describes how to formulate the most promising chemical strategies through mechanistic understanding, molecular design, and functional integration, thereby maximizing the successful development of clinical probes for visualization in humans.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.