ArticleChemical science2026
Simulating enzyme catalysis with electrostatically embedded machine learning potentials.
Article in Chemical science, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Evaluating Mechanical-Embedding ML/MM for Predicting Mutation Effects in Chorismate Mutase Catalysis.Journal of chemical theory and computation · 2026Article
- Accurate and Time-Efficient Condensed-Phase Free Energy Simulations with Reaction Specific Δ-Machine Learning Potentials in CHARMM.Journal of chemical theory and computation · 2026Article
- Multiscale Neural Network Potential with Anisotropic Message Passing for the Fast and Accurate Simulation of Protein Dynamics and Enzymatic Reactions.Journal of the American Chemical Society · 2026Article
- Article
- Boosting Computational Catalysis and Chemical Reactivity with Artificial Intelligence.Journal of the American Chemical Society · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
To simulate enzyme reactions, multiscale quantum mechanics/molecular mechanics (QM/MM) approaches are well established and popular. However, accurately and efficiently estimating enzyme activity is a challenge, because in general, precise methods are too computationally expensive. Here, we demonstrate that enzyme catalysis can be captured by coupling efficient, reactive machine-learned potentials (MLPs) trained on gas phase data to the wider enzyme environment using electrostatic machine learning embedding (EMLE). The EMLE scheme is first applied to the natural Diels-Alderase AbyU, showing that it correctly differentiates the catalytic action on different enzyme-substrate conformations. Then, we show that training a reaction-specific EMLE model allows us to accurately capture the enzyme catalytic effects of the conversion of chorismate to prephenate, a reaction with a highly polarizable and charged transition state. In both cases, in contrast to mechanical embedding approaches, the EMLE scheme allows accurate and efficient predictions of enzyme catalysis, agreeing with high-level QM/MM reference calculations. This approach facilitates the use of gas phase-trained MLPs in MLP/molecular mechanics (ML/MM) simulations and should thus be highly beneficial for computational activity screening of enzyme biocatalysts.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.