Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41816607›Full record

ArticleVideo journal of sports medicine

Breaking Down the Posteromedial Corner: Medial Collateral Ligament Augmentation.

Cameron Gerhold, Ali Can Koluman, Jose Vega, Fernando Gómez Verdejo, Robert LaPrade, Jorge Chahla

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Video journal of sports medicine. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Cameron GerholdDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5667-2699
Ali Can KolumanDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois, USA.
Jose VegaDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois, USA.
Fernando Gómez VerdejoDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois, USA.
Robert LaPradeTwin Cities Orthopaedics, Edina, Minnesota, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9823-2306
Jorge ChahlaDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: The medial collateral ligament (MCL) is often injured after a valgus stress is applied to the knee, which stresses the medial compartment. Pivoting and rotational movements during sports frequently cause MCL injuries. Indication: Selection of a surgical treatment option depends on the chronicity of the MCL injury, lower-limb axis alignment, the grade of the MCL injury, and other patient-specific factors. Technique Description: A medial hockey stick incision extending from proximal to the medial epicondyle to 7 cm distal to the joint line was made. The gracilis and semitendinosus tendons were identified after dissecting through the sartorial fascia. These tendons were then harvested using an open tendon stripper, leaving their distal tibial insertions undisturbed. A measurement of 6.1 cm distal to the joint line on the tibia was marked, establishing the distal attachment site of the superficial MCL. To better orient the harvested tendons, an anchor was placed in this location. The adductor magnus tendon and adductor tubercle were then identified, and measurements were made 12 mm distal and 8 mm anterior to the adductor tubercle, corresponding to the femoral attachment of the superficial MCL. A guide pin was placed at this location, and the knee was taken through a full range of motion to ensure isometry. A mark was placed 12 mm distal to the joint line, and a second anchor was placed here to recreate the tibial insertion site of the deep MCL. The graft was then passed distal to proximal underneath the plane lying directly over the MCL. The graft was then docked into the femoral socket and secured with a tenodesis screw with the knee in 30° of flexion and slight varus force. Results: Patients can expect improved clinical outcomes after posteromedial (PMC) reconstruction of the knee compared with a PMC repair. There is a significant decrease in the risk of failure when surgeons perform a PMC reconstruction. Discussion/Conclusion: Patients who undergo isolated MCL reconstruction can expect to remain nonweightbearing for the first 6 weeks after surgery. At 12 weeks postoperatively, patients should achieve a full, painless range of motion. Return to sport is typically between 6 and 9 months after MCL reconstruction. Patient Consent Disclosure Statement: The author(s) attests that consent has been obtained from any patient(s) appearing in this publication. If the individual may be identifiable, the author(s) has included a statement of release or other written form of approval from the patient(s) with this submission for publication.

Indexed as

kneeknee instabilitymedial collateral ligament augmentationposteromedial cornertechnique

Identifiers

PMID41816607
PMCPMC12972566

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.