ArticleJournal of gastrointestinal oncology2026
A hybrid molecular-imaging model for high-accuracy early colorectal cancer diagnosis.
Article in Journal of gastrointestinal oncology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Early and accurate detection of colorectal cancer (CRC) is crucial for improving patient survival; however, current screening methods often suffer from high false-negative rates, hindering timely diagnosis and treatment. This study aims to develop an innovative dual-path strategy that integrates molecular biomarkers with artificial intelligence (AI)-driven imaging techniques to enhance CRC detection accuracy and overcome limitations in existing screening methods. Methods: We utilized transcriptomic data from the Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO) database to identify nine key molecular biomarkers associated with CRC, including CDC25B and TEAD4, through differential expression analysis. Machine learning algorithms were employed to assess the diagnostic performance of these biomarkers. In parallel, an edge-aware Mamba-enhanced transformer network (EMT-Net) was developed for imaging segmentation, tested on the Computer Vision Center-Clinic Database (CVC-ClinicDB). Results: The molecular biomarkers showed significant diagnostic potential, achieving an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC) of 0.987 in independent validation. The EMT-Net model demonstrated superior segmentation performance compared to current state-of-the-art methods on the CVC-ClinicDB, showing improved accuracy and precision in CRC detection. Conclusions: By combining molecular biomarker analysis with advanced imaging segmentation, our dual-path strategy offers complementary advantages: biological insights from molecular data and clinical precision from imaging techniques. This integrated approach shows exceptional cross-dataset robustness, with significant potential to enhance early CRC detection in clinical practice.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.