ArticleJournal of gastrointestinal oncology2026
Short- and long-term outcomes after laparoscopic and open liver resection for combined hepatocellular-cholangiocarcinoma patients: a propensity score-matched study.
Article in Journal of gastrointestinal oncology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Robotic versus open surgery for gallbladder cancer: a meta-analysis of propensity-score-matched studies.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Pooled it
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: The feasibility and safety of laparoscopic liver resection (LLR) and open liver resection (OLR) in combined hepatocellular-cholangiocarcinoma (cHCC-CCA) patients remain controversial. This study compared the clinical outcomes of LLR versus OLR for patients with cHCC-CCA. Methods: Clinicopathological features of cHCC-CCA patients who underwent liver resection (LR) between 2010 and 2022 were retrospectively analyzed. Propensity score matching (PSM) was employed to balance intergroup differences. Univariate and multivariate Cox analyses were employed to identify independent predictors of overall survival (OS). Results: Of the 141 cHCC-CCA patients, 78 underwent LLR and 63 underwent OLR. After PSM, the LLR group had lower estimated blood loss (EBL) (200 Conclusions: cHCC-CCA patients undergoing LLR are safe and feasible with lower EBL, and shorter postoperative LOS. No statistically significant difference in long-term OS was observed between LLR and OLR.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.