ArticleJournal of gastrointestinal oncology2026
Training and validation of a nomogram for predicting synchronous distant organ metastasis in patients with very-early-onset colorectal cancer.
Article in Journal of gastrointestinal oncology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Colorectal cancer (CRC) ranks among the leading causes of cancer-related mortality, with a sharp rise in incidence among patients diagnosed before age 40, a group classified as having very-early-onset CRC (VEO-CRC). Because synchronous distant organ metastasis (DOM) at diagnosis is common and worsens survival, this study aimed to identify predictors of DOM, develop and internally validate a nomogram to estimate individual DOM risk, and evaluate its potential clinical utility. Methods: Utilizing data from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database spanning 2010 to 2020, we identified patients diagnosed with malignant colorectal adenocarcinoma under 40 years. Patients who met the inclusion criteria were randomly assigned to the training set and the validation set. Logistic regression analyses were performed to identify risk factors for DOM, which were subsequently used to construct a nomogram. The model's performance was assessed through receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves, calibration plots, and decision curve analysis (DCA). Results: A total of 8,097 VEO-CRC patients were assigned to training (n=5,667) and validation (n=2,430) cohorts. DOM among patients with malignant colorectal adenocarcinoma under 40 years was 23.04%. Multivariate analysis revealed seven independent risk factors for DOM: race, tumor size, primary tumor location, histopathological grade, tumor (T) stage, node (N) stage, and carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) level. The nomogram demonstrated an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.846 [95% confidence interval (CI): 0.834-0.858] for the training cohort and 0.833 (95% CI: 0.813-0.852) for the validation cohort, indicating strong predictive accuracy. The clinical utility of the nomogram was verified in the DCA. Conclusions: The predictive nomogram, derived from demographic, clinical, and pathological data from the SEER database, provides an estimation of the DOM risk in VEO-CRC patients. This is a promising tool to improve outcomes for young patients by assisting physicians in early risk stratification and bespoke treatment planning. At prespecified risk thresholds, the predicted probabilities may assist early risk stratification and inform imaging and follow-up decisions, though their clinical application will require confirmation through rigorous external validation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.