ArticleJournal of gastrointestinal oncology2026
Private equity acquisitions of hospitals and the changing landscape of care for patients with gastrointestinal cancer.
Article in Journal of gastrointestinal oncology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Association of Cancer Center Designation with Multimodality Treatment, Perioperative Outcomes, and Survival among Older Adults with Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma.Annals of surgical oncology · 2026Article
- Return on investment, return of risk: private equity in gastrointestinal cancer care.Journal of gastrointestinal oncology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: The growing presence of private equity (PE) in the United States (U.S.) healthcare raises concern about access, costs, care quality, and outcomes. This study explores the specific impact of PE-owned hospitals on gastrointestinal (GI) cancer care. Methods: Patients undergoing GI cancer surgery were identified from the linked Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER)-Medicare database (2012-2020). Propensity score matching compared PE and non-PE hospitals. Difference-in-difference and multivariable models evaluated GI surgical outcomes, adjusting for patient and hospital-level characteristics. Results: Among 1,887 GI cancer patients (hepatopancreatic: n=127, 6.7%; colorectal: n=1,760, 93.3%), the majority were male (n=1,030, 54.6%), White (n=1,526, 80.9%), with early-stage disease (stage I/II: n=1,009, 54%) and a median age of 75 [interquartile range (IQR), 70-82] years. Surgeries at PE-owned hospitals comprised 31.7% (n=599). Compared to non-PE hospitals, patients treated at PE-owned centers were more often Black (18.7% Conclusions: PE hospital acquisitions reduce staffing, limit Medicaid patient's access, and increase infection risks-underlining the need to protect equity and quality in GI cancer care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.