ArticleFrontiers in psychiatry2026
Effects of Cyberball on cognitive vulnerability for suicide in youth with a history of multiple suicide attempts.
Article in Frontiers in psychiatry, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: While the precipitants for suicide are varied, interpersonal stressors are commonly identified. We hypothesized that interpersonal stressors increase suicide risk by exacerbating cognitive vulnerabilities in decision-making, cognitive control, and implicit associations between the self and death/suicide. Methods: Interpersonal stress was modeled using the Cyberball paradigm in forty youth (16-24y) with a history of multiple (≥2) suicide attempts. Participants were randomized to either a social exclusion or overinclusion condition. Changes in mood and cognition were assessed before and after Cyberball using visual analog scales, the Game of Dice Task, the Iowa Gambling Task, the Balloon Analog Risk Test, the Word Color Stroop Test, and the Death/Suicide Implicit Association Test. Results: Social exclusion and overinclusion did not significantly impact decision-making, cognitive control or implicit association of the self with death/suicide, though high inter-individual variability was observed. Group differences were observed in the change in anger ( Conclusions: As compared to social overinclusion, Cyberball-induced social exclusion did not significantly influence performance on cognitive tasks associated with suicide risk. Future research may consider within-subject designs comparing exclusion and inclusion paradigms, using alternative acute stress manipulations or powering studies to detect smaller effect sizes when studying interpersonal stress in youth at high-risk for suicide.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.