ReviewStroke (Hoboken, N.J.)2026
Technical Performance and Interpretation of Digital Subtraction Angiography to Determine Cerebral Circulatory Arrest in Patients Being Evaluated for Brain Death/Death by Neurological Criteria: A Brief Practice Update From the Society of Vascular and Interventional Neurology (SVIN).
Review in Stroke (Hoboken, N.J.), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
28 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe Society of Vascular and Interventional Neurology (SVIN) Guidelines and Practice Standards Committee issues Brief Practice Updates to provide concise, evidence-based recommendations and suggestions on focused topics relevant to vascular and interventional neurology. Currently, there is limited published guidance on the technical performance and interpretative parameters of cerebral digital subtraction angiography for the determination of cerebral circulatory arrest in patients being evaluated for brain death/death by neurological criteria. In this Brief Practice Update, we present consensus-based suggestions for standardizing the performance, interpretation, and application of digital subtraction angiography in this context.
methodsThis Brief Practice Update was developed using the SVIN Standards and Parameters for Guideline Development in the classification of evidence and Class of Recommendation when evidence is available and Expert Opinion recommendation when evidence is lacking. The Guidelines and Practice Standards committee convened a multidisciplinary writing group to establish key clinical questions and develop a survey assessing Expert Opinion on the role of digital subtraction angiography in cerebral circulatory arrest determination. Survey items addressed technical considerations, interpretation criteria, and clinical integration. Iterative refinement was achieved through group consensus, and the final survey was distributed to a panel of experts in neurointervention and neurocritical care. The SVIN Guidelines and Practice Standards Quality Committee reviewed the findings for adherence to SVIN's internal evidence evaluation guidelines before submission to the SVIN board for societal endorsement.
resultsEvidence was evaluated by the writing group when available, and Expert Opinion was assessed using survey results. Suggested recommendations follow the established SVIN guideline framework for Class of Recommendation and Level of Evidence, with an Expert Opinion endorsement category for areas lacking high-quality evidence at the time of publication.
conclusionsThis update standardizes how to perform, interpret, and report digital subtraction angiography when used to assess cerebral circulatory arrest in brain death/death by neurological criteria evaluations, aiming to improve reproducibility across centers. It provides a structured framework to improve consistency and reliability among practitioners performing and interpreting cerebral angiography in this setting.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.