Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41816503›Full record

ReviewCambridge prisms. Precision medicine2025

Precision oncology: Computational methods for multi-omics data integration to improve drug response prediction.

Guna Gouru

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cambridge prisms. Precision medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Guna GouruDepartment of Health Sciences, Northeastern University - Boston Campus, Boston, MA, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2854-8513

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cancer heterogeneity presents a major obstacle to effective drug treatment, emphasizing the need for personalized approaches that can accurately predict drug responses. Advances in high-throughput technologies have driven precision medicine initiatives toward integrating multi-omics data, enabling a more comprehensive understanding of tumor biology. However, integration of diverse omics layers poses challenges for computational modeling, as many traditional machine learning (ML) and statistical methods are not designed to capture complex, high-dimensional and multimodal data. This review examines the studies that integrate multi-omics datasets, aiming to enhance drug response prediction (DRP). Specifically, it outlines the most used omics types and computational approaches - classical ML models, as well as advanced deep learning and multimodal integration frameworks for improving DRP, detailing key methodologies and evaluation metrics, such as area under the dose-response curve, F1 score and mean square error, which assess model performance. By summarizing the integrated omics data, computational methods and challenges encountered, this review provides an in-depth overview of the existing landscape of precision medicine and future directions for advancing drug-response prediction.

Indexed as

computational approachesdrug-response predictionomicsprecision medicine

Identifiers

PMID41816503
PMCPMC12973241

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.