Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41816482›Full record

ReviewJournal of thoracic disease2026

Misdiagnosis of superior sulcus tumours: a scoping review.

Michael Wilkinson, Steven Obst, Tanya Palmer, Georgina Whish-Wilson

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of thoracic disease, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Michael WilkinsonSchool of Health, Medical, and Applied Sciences, Central Queensland University, Cairns, QLD, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7072-9644
Steven ObstSchool of Health, Medical, and Applied Sciences, Central Queensland University, Bundaberg, QLD, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4299-9628
Tanya PalmerSchool of Health, Medical, and Applied Sciences, Central Queensland University, Bundaberg, QLD, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0004-4372-0953
Georgina Whish-WilsonSchool of Health, Medical, and Applied Sciences, Central Queensland University, Cairns, QLD, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9881-8019

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Superior sulcus tumours (SSTs) are a rare but serious non-small cell lung cancer that requires aggressive multi-modal intervention. Existing literature suggests patient outcomes are adversely affected by diagnosis delay, often from misdiagnosis as a musculoskeletal condition. As such, the aims of this review were to identify the key clinical features of SSTs documented in the literature and differentiate them from commonly misdiagnosed musculoskeletal pathologies. Methods: In accordance with Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines for scoping reviews (PRISMA-ScR), a systematic search of electronic databases was conducted for studies of SST patients with descriptions of their signs and symptoms. These findings along with information on any length of diagnostic delay or misdiagnosis were extracted for analysis. Results: The final review included a sample of 1,328 patients across 31 studies. A total of 111 patients had a misdiagnosis resulting in diagnostic delay. The most common presentation across all SSTs was shoulder pain (60.0%), followed by a history of smoking (27.0%), and arm pain (25.6%). Diagnostic delay was most frequently due to radiographic error by primary contact physicians. For patients who received a misdiagnosis, the most common clinical findings were signs and symptoms of upper limb neuropathy (55.7%), shoulder pain (53.2%) and chest pain (27.9%). Within this subgroup, SSTs were most frequently misdiagnosed as cervical spine radiculopathy, cervical spine osteoarthritis, or glenohumeral osteoarthritis. Additionally, within the misdiagnosis subgroup, key features of SSTs such as Horner's syndrome and history of smoking were less prevalent compared to the larger group. Conclusions: Explicit testing and differentiation between shoulder and cervical spine pathology are required when examining patients with atraumatic shoulder and/or arm pain to rule out SSTs. Specifically, targeted testing for cervical spine radiculopathy and glenohumeral osteoarthritis can help guide appropriate imaging in the initial stages of assessment. When requested, apical lung imaging should be scrutinized to prevent physicians from missing radiographic signs of SSTs that may lead to diagnostic delay.

Indexed as

diagnostic delaydifferential diagnosismisdiagnosisPancoast tumoursSuperior sulcus tumours (SSTs)

Identifiers

PMID41816482
PMCPMC12972777

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.