Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41816461›Full record

ArticleJournal of thoracic disease2026

What is the learning curve of the "outside the cage" robotic approach?-a prospective single-center study.

Arthur Streit, Mickael Schaeffer, Florent Stasiak, Ulrich Gerhard, Joseph Seitlinger, Stéphane Renaud

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of thoracic disease, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Arthur StreitDepartment of Thoracic Surgery, University Regional Hospital of Nancy, Nancy, France.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0064-1161
Mickael SchaefferDepartment of Thoracic Surgery, University Regional Hospital of Nancy, Nancy, France.
Florent StasiakDepartment of Thoracic Surgery, University Regional Hospital of Nancy, Nancy, France.
Ulrich GerhardDepartment of Thoracic Surgery, University Regional Hospital of Nancy, Nancy, France.
Joseph SeitlingerDepartment of Thoracic Surgery, University Regional Hospital of Nancy, Nancy, France.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4091-4638
Stéphane RenaudDepartment of Thoracic Surgery, University Regional Hospital of Nancy, Nancy, France.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4448-7696

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Minimally invasive thoracic surgery, including robot-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (RATS), has improved outcomes by reducing postoperative pain. However, intercostal nerve trauma from transthoracic approaches remains a concern. The "outside the cage" (OTC) subcostal robotic approach may reduce pain while maintaining safety. This study aimed to evaluate the learning curve of this technique in major lung and anterior mediastinal resections. Methods: We conducted a prospective single-center study from January 2024 to April 2025. All procedures were performed by a single experienced robotic surgeon using the Da Vinci Xi system. Cumulative sum (CUSUM) analysis evaluated learning curves for docking and console times in two groups: major lung resections and thymectomy/anterior mediastinal mass resections. Results: Of 131 patients, 107 were operated on by one surgeon: 67 underwent major lung resection and 40 thymectomy or anterior mediastinal mass resection. CUSUM analysis of docking time identified three phases-training, improvement (cases 17-33 for thymectomy/anterior mediastinal mass resection, cases 31-38 for major lung resection), and mastery (case 34 onwards for thymectomy/anterior mediastinal mass resection, case 39 onwards for major lung resection)-in both groups. In contrast, no distinct learning curve was observed for console time, suggesting proficiency from the outset. No conversions occurred except one due to vascular invasion. At 30 days, no patients reported neuropathic pain or needed analgesics. Conclusions: The OTC subcostal approach appears safe and rapidly adoptable for experienced robotic surgeons, with a brief learning curve limited to docking maneuvers. These findings support its reproducibility and potential wider adoption of this pain-reducing technique.

Indexed as

outside the cage (OTC)Robot-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (RATS)subcostal approachsubxiphoid approach

Identifiers

PMID41816461
PMCPMC12972796

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.