ReviewJournal of thoracic disease2026
Narrative review: a multidisciplinary approach to chest wall reconstruction.
Review in Journal of thoracic disease, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Hybrid chest wall reconstruction using a composite scaffold and mesh: a surgical technique.Journal of thoracic disease · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background and Objective: Chest wall reconstruction (CWR) remains a surgical challenge for both thoracic and plastic surgeons owing to the physiologic and anatomic complexity of the region. Successful reconstruction re-establish chest wall integrity, obliterate dead space, preserve pulmonary function, and ensure robust soft tissue coverage. This narrative review discusses modern principles of CWR, including advances in biomaterials and surgical techniques, with an emphasis on the role of thoracoplastic collaboration. Methods: A literature search was performed on PubMed for MeSH terms and keywords pertinent to CWR. Randomized controlled trials, retrospective studies, systematic reviews and case studies published from November 5, 1995 through November 5, 2025 were eligible for inclusion. Key Content and Findings: New biomaterials have popularized hybrid and mesh-based approaches to skeletal fixation that preserve respiratory function and protect native tissue from implanted materials. Virtual surgical planning (VSP) and three-dimensional (3D) technology is increasingly used for operative planning and fabricating custom prostheses. While local pedicled flaps remain a mainstay of soft tissue reconstruction, advances in microsurgical tissue transfer have allowed for reconstruction of increasingly large and complex defects. Employing a thoracoplastic approach to CWR is vital to successfully reconstructing complex defects. Conclusions: CWR remains an area of active innovation, and reconstructive approach varies widely by anatomic region, defect characteristics, and surgeon preference. The rise of new biomaterials and 3D printing holds immense promise for custom reconstructive approaches. Formalized thoracoplastic collaboration throughout the perioperative period is crucial to leveraging the expertise of both thoracic and plastic surgeons, particularly in highly complex cases.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.