Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41816402›Full record

ReviewJournal of thoracic disease2026

Pediatric pericardiectomy-a narrative review.

Noy Meshulami, Shubhi Kaushik, Raghav Murthy

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of thoracic disease, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Noy MeshulamiIcahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA.
Shubhi KaushikPediatric Critical Care, Department of Pediatrics, Kravis Children's Hospital at Mount Sinai, Icahn School of Medicine, New York, NY, USA.
Raghav MurthyCongenital Heart Surgery Program, Medical City Children's Hospital, Dallas, TX, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background and Objective: Pediatric pericardiectomies are rare operations used to treat recurrent, purulent, or constrictive pericarditis. Given the lack of pediatric-specific guidelines, we conducted a review to summarize the current literature on pediatric pericardiectomies including: etiology, diagnosis, timing of operation, surgical methods, and outcomes. Methods: We conducted a PubMed literature review including articles in English from 2000-2025. To ensure completeness, we utilized a systematic search with "pediatric" and "pericardiectomy" as medical subject heading or text words. We identified 92 articles and included 58 relevant publications. Key Content and Findings: The most common etiology of pericarditis in pediatric patients requiring a pericardiectomy is idiopathic. The second most common etiology is prior cardiac surgery in the United States and bacterial infections in India. The majority of pediatric patients (i.e., >80%) treated with a pericardiectomy present with dyspnea, chest pain, or heart failure symptoms. Transthoracic echocardiogram (TTE) is the first line imaging test. Adult guidelines for the treatment of pericarditis can be utilized to inform individualized care decisions, including timing of operation, for pediatric patients potentially requiring a pericardiectomy. Specifically for constrictive pericarditis, pericardiectomy is the mainstay treatment for chronic constriction. In addition, there is concern that delaying surgery in cases of constrictive pericarditis could result in deteriorating patient status and irreversible myocardial damage. Most pediatric pericardiectomies (~90%) are performed without the use of cardiopulmonary bypass. Complete pericardiectomies are more common than partial pericardiectomies, and a median sternotomy is the most utilized approach. Among patients in the United States, the mortality rate is ~2% (1/45, range 0-4%) compared to ~11% (8/70, range 0-22%) in lower-resourced countries. The increased mortality rate in lower-resourced countries could be due to the predominance of tubercular etiology or delayed patient presentation, emphasizing the potential importance of identifying patients requiring pericardiectomy and intervening early. Conclusions: Pediatric pericardiectomies are rare and generally safe operations, especially in the United States. There is a need to further investigate and delineate outcomes in relation to timing for pediatric pericardiectomies.

Indexed as

congenital cardiac surgeryPediatric pericardiectomypediatric pericarditis

Identifiers

PMID41816402
PMCPMC12972793

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.