ArticleJournal of thoracic disease2026
Safety and effectiveness of nivolumab in patients with locally advanced or metastatic non-small cell lung cancer in China: a nationwide electronic health record dataset analysis.
Article in Journal of thoracic disease, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: While the efficacy and safety of nivolumab have been demonstrated in clinical trials involving Chinese patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), real-world evidence on treatment patterns, safety, and clinical outcomes remains limited. This study aimed to investigate the safety profile and effectiveness of nivolumab in Chinese NSCLC patients. Methods: This retrospective observational cohort included patients diagnosed with advanced NSCLC who received at least one dose of nivolumab between June 1, 2018, and August 31, 2022, as identified from the National Anti-Tumor Drug Surveillance System (NATDSS). Longitudinal electronic health record (EHR) data for the identified patients were used to assess safety outcomes, treatment patterns, overall survival (OS), and real-world progression-free survival (rwPFS). Safety outcomes and treatment patterns were analyzed descriptively. Time-to-event outcomes, including OS and rwPFS, were evaluated using the Kaplan-Meier (KM) method and reported as median time to event with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Subgroup analyses of safety and effectiveness were conducted according to line of therapy, treatment regimen (monotherapy or combination), and tumor histology. Results: A total of 2,649 eligible patients with locally advanced or metastatic NSCLC were identified across 224 hospitals in China. The median age was 63.0 years, and the median time from diagnosis to nivolumab initiation was 90.0 days [interquartile range (IQR): 12-327 days]. Nivolumab was administered as first-line therapy in 52.9% (n=1,400), second-line in 31.8% (n=842), and third-line or beyond in 23.1% (n=613) of patients. The median follow-up was 12.9 months (95% CI: 12.4-13.7). Immune-related adverse events (irAEs) occurred in 14.8% (n=391) of the patients, with grade 3-4 irAEs in 2.5% (n=67). The incidence of grade 3-4 irAEs was slightly higher in the combination therapy group than in the monotherapy group (2.5% Conclusions: This large-scale, real-world study provides further evidence of manageable safety profile and favorable effectiveness of nivolumab in Chinese patients with advanced NSCLC. These findings support the continued use of nivolumab in appropriate patients and provide reassurance that real-world outcomes are consistent with those observed in clinical trials.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.