ArticleJournal of thoracic disease2026
Treatment of the infection in deep sternal wound infections-a single center cohort study.
Article in Journal of thoracic disease, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: In the treatment of deep sternal wound infections (DSWIs) using negative pressure wound therapy (NPWT), infection therapy is separated from reconstruction of the thoracic wall. It is difficult to decide when NPWT can end in order to close the wound. Often ideal conditions cannot be achieved. Must or can sterility be waited for and should antibiotics be administered and if so for how long? These questions are discussed here. Methods: A retrospective single center analysis is performed. Patients who developed a DSWI after cardiac surgery between 2014 and 2020 are included. The following parameters are collected: baseline data, number of negative pressure dressing changes, frequency of persistence of infection and antibacterial therapy performed at closure. Either a short-term antibiotic therapy over 5 days or a therapy corresponding to the osteomyelitis treatment over 6 weeks was carried out. Results: In 79 patients, sterility was achieved after 10.2±3.9 (mean ± standard deviation) changes of the negative pressure dressing using NPWT. In 51 patients, NPWT was terminated after 7.4±5.3 changes without achieving sterility. The number of changes varied significantly. If sterility could be achieved, the frequency of infection complications was significantly lower. Long-term antibiotic therapy resulted in significantly fewer infections than short-term therapy. Conclusions: Microbiological sterility should be achieved if possible. This requires more dressing changes, but the complications are rarer. If it is not possible to wait for sterility, long-term antibiotic therapy is required if osteomyelitis occurs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.