ArticleInfection prevention in practice2026
Peri-operative antibiotic prophylaxis in obstetrics: a 6-year evaluation of guideline adherence and stewardship impact in a Ukrainian maternity hospital.
Article in Infection prevention in practice, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Longitudinal analysis of antimicrobial consumption and economic outcomes of surgical prophylaxis stewardship in a wartime Ukrainian maternity hospital.Antimicrobial stewardship & healthcare epidemiology : ASHE · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Surgical-site infections are a major concern in obstetric surgery. In Ukraine, evolving national guidelines and institutional antimicrobial stewardship (AMS) initiatives have sought to optimize peri-operative antibiotic prophylaxis (PAP), but their impact on clinical outcomes requires rigorous evaluation. Methods: We conducted a retrospective cohort study (2018-2023) of 474 obstetric surgeries to evaluate changes in PAP adherence and its association with length of stay (LOS). Adherence was assessed using a 3-point compliance score (timing, choice, and duration). The association between compliance and time to discharge was analysed using a multi-variable Cox proportional hazards model. Findings: A marked improvement in practice was observed; full compliance increased from 11% to 71%, while mean LOS decreased from 9.9 to 4.7 days. Component analysis showed that structural interventions eliminated duration errors, while errors in antibiotic choice persisted. In the multi-variable model, the 'year of surgery' was the strongest predictor of earlier discharge ( Conclusion: Multi-faceted AMS programs can successfully optimize PAP adherence and improve outcomes. While the overall reduction in LOS is driven by broad improvements over time, specific guideline adherence remains a crucial quality indicator, particularly for standardized procedures.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.