Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41816304›Full record

ArticleiScience2026

Spatiotemporal evolution and driving mechanism of synergistic carbon and pollution reduction.

Zhongyao Cai, Xuhui Ding, Xinyu Yang, Xu Chu, Xinling Jiang, Ping Jiang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in iScience, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Zhongyao CaiDepartment of Environmental Science and Engineering, Fudan University, Shanghai 200438, China.
Xuhui DingSchool of Finance and Economics, Jiangsu University, Zhenjiang 212013, China.
Xinyu YangDepartment of Space, Earth and Environment, Chalmers University of Technology, Gothenburg 41296, Sweden.
Xu ChuDepartment of Environmental Science and Engineering, Fudan University, Shanghai 200438, China.
Xinling JiangDepartment of Environmental Science and Engineering, Fudan University, Shanghai 200438, China.
Ping JiangFudan Tyndall Center, Fudan University, Shanghai 200438, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Climate change and environmental pollution are key global challenges, with synergistic carbon-pollution reduction a global consensus. As the world's largest developing economy and carbon emitter, China's experience informs global synergistic governance. Spatiotemporal evolution and driving mechanisms of synergistic carbon and pollution reduction from 297 Chinese cities (2000-2023) are examined, applying the coupling coordination degree, k-means clustering, difference-in-differences, and moderating effect models. Findings show that the national coupling coordination degree of synergistic carbon and pollution reduction (CCD-SCPR) exhibits an inverted U-shaped dynamic evolution and gradient spatial differentiation. The "core-periphery" clustering pattern is found, with nearly half of the cities remaining in a dilemma of low CCD-SCPR, underscoring the urgency of synergistic governance. Data element marketization significantly improves CCD-SCPR by breaking information barriers, optimizing resource allocation, and empowering technological innovation. It forms a positive moderating effect with environmental regulation, yielding extra governance benefits. Proposals include differentiated strategies, innovative urban governance, optimized policy coordination, and deeper data element reforms.

Indexed as

EconomicsEnvironmental policyEnvironmental sciencePollution

Identifiers

PMID41816304
PMCPMC12972967

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.