Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41816297›Full record

ArticleiScience2026

Replicative senescence induction in single cells is not predicted by telomere length, dysfunction, or oxidation.

Victor Passanisi, Sabrina L Spencer

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in iScience, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Victor PassanisiDepartment of Biochemistry and BioFrontiers Institute, University of Colorado Boulder, Boulder, CO 80303, USA.
Sabrina L SpencerDepartment of Biochemistry and BioFrontiers Institute, University of Colorado Boulder, Boulder, CO 80303, USA.

Funding

PROLIFERATION-QUIESCENCE CONTROL IN SINGLE CELLS: INTEGRATION OF MITOGEN, NUTRIENT, AND STRESS SIGNALINGDP2CA238330 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO · PI SPENCER, SABRINA LEIGH · 2018 to 2018
$2.3M
Progressive states of cell-cycle withdrawalR01AG082942 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO · PI Sabrina Leigh Spencer · 2023 to 2026
$1.5M
Laser Scanning Confocal MicroscopeS10OD034320 · OD · UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO · PI DRAGAVON, JOSEPH · 2023 to 2023
$445k
NCI NIH HHS DP2 CA238330NIA NIH HHS R01 AG082942NIH HHS S10 OD034320
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The accumulation of senescent cells during aging contributes to age-associated diseases. Current models posit that replicative senescence is driven by telomere dysfunction, including telomere shortening, telomere-associated DNA damage response (DDR), and telomere oxidation. Here, we first show that aging primary human fibroblasts gradually increase the time spent in a CDK2-low non-cycling state and increase senescence biomarker expression. We then evaluate telomere features as single-cell senescence biomarkers in a workflow linking high-throughput, long-term time-lapse imaging with confocal imaging to map cell-cycle dynamics to telomere features in the same cell. Our results show that telomere length and DDR do not reliably distinguish cycling from non-cycling cells at any age, and that telomere oxidation is not associated with cell-cycle withdrawal. Instead, lysosomal content, cell size, genomic architecture, and p21 more reliably mark senescence induction, depicting replicative senescence as a complex state transition with currently measurable telomere features being weakly correlated with senescence.

Indexed as

cell biologyfunctional aspects of cell biology

Identifiers

PMID41816297
PMCPMC12973724

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.