ReviewJournal of orthodontic science2026
Rapid maxillary expansion effects on masticatory muscle activity: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
Review in Journal of orthodontic science, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This systematic review aims to assess the impact of rapid maxillary expansion (RME) on masticatory muscle activity through electromyographic analysis. A systematic review was conducted according to the Cochrane Collaboration guide. The PICO strategy was employed to formulate the clinical question. A comprehensive search review was performed up to September 2022 across five databases (PubMed, Web of Science, Scopus, Embase, and Cochrane) and gray literature (Google Scholar). The risk of bias was performed using the Risk of Bias in Nonrandomized Studies of Interventions (ROBINS I) tool. Means and standard deviations were extracted to perform the meta-analysis, and overall quality was assessed using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation approach. Nine nonrandomized studies with a moderate risk of bias were included in this systematic review. Meta-analysis of electromyographic data during clenching demonstrated an increase in anterior temporal muscle activity after RME (
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.