Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41816272›Full record

ArticleJournal of orthodontic science2026

Pain experience during initial alignment with self-ligating and conventional fixed orthodontic appliance system: A comparative clinical study.

Sahal A Alforaidi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of orthodontic science, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Sahal A AlforaidiDepartment of Preventive Dental Science, College of Dentistry, Taibah University, Medinah, Saudi Arabia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo compare pain experiences in patients treated with self-ligating (SmartClip™) and conventional (Victory™) preadjusted edgewise brackets during initial alignment. MATERIALS AND

methodsSeventy-three patients (50 females and 23 males) between 15 and 21 years of age were randomly allocated either the SmartClip appliance or the Victory

resultsPain peaked between 24 hours and 3 days and gradually declined. No significant differences in pain scores were observed between groups at any time point (

conclusionThere were no clinically significant differences in pain perception between the two bracket systems during initial alignment. The current evidence does not support claims that one bracket system results in lower perceived pain levels than another.

Indexed as

Alignmentconventional bracketsorthodontic painself-ligating brackets

Identifiers

PMID41816272
PMCPMC12974941

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.