ArticleJournal of orthodontic science2026
Assessing the relationship between mini-screw implant shape and primary stability: An experimental study in orthodontics.
Article in Journal of orthodontic science, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesMini-screw implants (MSI) are widely used in orthodontics as temporary anchorage device. Implant geometry, including shape and diameter, is a major contributor to their mechanical retention, and osseointegration. This study aimed to evaluate the influence of MSI shape (cylindrical vs. tapered), and diameter (1.2 vs. 1.4 mm) on peak removal torque (PRT) over different subsequent periods with 7 mm length for all used MSI. MATERIAL AND
methodsA total of 160 titanium mini-screws were inserted into the tibiae of three adult sheep. Implants were divided into four groups according to shape and diameter, further subdivided by different post-insertion removal intervals: immediate, 2 weeks, 4 weeks, and 6 weeks. As eight implants per animal multiple by three animals result in 24 implants per group per time. A standardized surgical protocol was used, and PRT was measured using a digital torque driver. Statistical analysis was conducted using three-way ANOVA, where
resultsPRT values increased significantly across all groups over time. Larger diameter implants (1.4 mm) exhibited significantly higher torque values compared to 1.2 mm implants at all time points. Cylindrical MSI generally outperformed tapered implants at 4 and 6 weeks. The highest torque values were recorded at 6 weeks in all groups.
conclusionImplant diameter and shape significantly affect MSI stability. Larger diameters provide superior mechanical retention, while cylindrical shapes may offer advantages in later healing stages. These findings support selection of MSI geometry to optimize clinical outcomes in orthodontic anchorage.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.