Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41816270›Full record

ArticleJournal of orthodontic science2026

Determining the salivary levels of Transforming Growth Factor Beta 1 (TGF-β1) and Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor (VEGF) during the three stages of orthodontic treatment in patients in Mangaluru: A prospective study.

Shebah Catherine, V Harshitha, Sreeraj Surendran, Pratham Shetty, Megha L B Agni, Jitendra Rao, Kishore Kumar

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of orthodontic science, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Shebah CatherineOrthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics, A J Institute of Dental Sciences, Kuntikana, Mangaluru, Karnataka, India.
V HarshithaOrthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics, A J Institute of Dental Sciences, Kuntikana, Mangaluru, Karnataka, India.
Sreeraj SurendranA. J. Research Center, A. J. Institute of Medical Sciences and Research Center, Kuntikana, Mangaluru, Karnataka, India.
Pratham ShettyOrthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics, A J Institute of Dental Sciences, Kuntikana, Mangaluru, Karnataka, India.
Megha L B AgniA. J. Research Center, A. J. Institute of Medical Sciences and Research Center, Kuntikana, Mangaluru, Karnataka, India.
Jitendra RaoA. J. Research Center, A. J. Institute of Medical Sciences and Research Center, Kuntikana, Mangaluru, Karnataka, India.
Kishore KumarOrthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics, A J Institute of Dental Sciences, Kuntikana, Mangaluru, Karnataka, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSaliva is a valuable, noninvasive diagnostic fluid that mirrors the body's health, especially during physiological changes such as orthodontic tooth movement. The application of orthodontic force triggers an inflammatory response in the periodontal ligament, leading to the release of biomarkers like Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor (VEGF) and Transforming Growth Factor Beta 1 (TGF-β1), both crucial for bone remodeling and tissue repair. However, there are limited data on how salivary levels of these biomarkers change during different stages of fixed orthodontic treatment with NiTi archwires. The aim of the study was to determine the salivary levels of VEGF and TGF-β1 during each stage of the fixed orthodontic treatment using NiTi wires. MATERIALS AND

methodsThis prospective observational study involved 11 patients requiring fixed orthodontic treatment with premolar extraction. Saliva samples were collected at four different time intervals: T0, Pretreatment; T1, 1 month after placement of 0.014/0.016 Round NiTi; T2, 1 month after placement of 0.017 × 0.025 Rectangular NiTi; and T3, 1 month after placement of 0.019 × 0.025 Rectangular NiTi. VEGF and TGF-β levels were analyzed using a high-sensitivity enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA). The data were analyzed using repeated measures ANOVA.

resultsThe mean VEGF concentration was 260.00 ± 188.42 pg/mL at T0, 144.32 ± 175.81 pg/Ml at T1, 228.95 ± 142.05 pg/Ml at T2, and 309.11 ± 285.43 pg/mL at T3. Although fluctuations in VEGF levels were observed over time, the difference was not statistically significant (F = 1.679,

conclusionThough the VEGF and TGF-β1 levels in saliva showed significant clinical changes, they did not show statistically significant variation across the different stages of orthodontic treatment. However, the findings of this study indicate that saliva can be used as an alternative to gingival crevicular fluid (GCF) for estimating the levels of TGF-β1, which addresses a significant gap in the literature. Future research with larger sample sizes and more diverse populations is required to fully establish the reliability and generalizability of salivary VEGF and TGF-β1 monitoring in orthodontic practice.

Indexed as

Angiogenesisbiomarkersbone remodelingfixed orthodontic treatmentosteogenesissalivatransforming growth factor beta 1vascular endothelial growth factor

Identifiers

PMID41816270
PMCPMC12974935

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.