Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41816192›Full record

ArticleEClinicalMedicine2026

Alleviating price and information barriers to long-acting contraception uptake in Kenyan pharmacies using patient and provider incentives: a cluster randomized control trial.

Maria Dieci, Carlos Paramo, Paul J Gertler

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in EClinicalMedicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Maria DieciDepartment of Health Policy and Management, Emory University, Rollins School of Public Health, Atlanta, GA, USA.
Carlos ParamoKing Center on Global Development, Stanford University, Palo Alto, CA, USA.
Paul J GertlerHaas School of Business, University of California, Berkeley, NBER, Berkeley, CA, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Access to modern family planning impacts women's health, education, and economic well-being. Persistent barriers to accessing long-acting methods, such as price and lack of information, limit adoption. This study highlights the potential of a novel payment and incentive structure for pharmacies, a key access point for contraceptives for young women in particular, to improve access to subcutaneous depot medroxyprogesterone acetate (DMPA-SC). By targeting incentives to either patients or providers through a low-cost digital tool, the intervention aims to enhance contraceptive choice cost-effectively with potential for scale. Methods: We randomized 137 pharmacies in Kenya into three intervention arms, varying patient copay, pharmacy profit, or pharmacy cost to stock DMPA-SC, plus a status quo control group that conducted pharmacy operations as usual. All pharmacies used an app-based platform for sales and inventory tracking, and a digital tool to manage family planning sales, through which client discounts for DMPA-SC, pharmacy cost to stock DMPA-SC, or pharmacy profit for DMPA-SC were experimentally varied in the intervention arms. We used double/debiased machine learning for adjusted models, with the primary outcome being uptake of DMPA-SC, and secondary outcomes being couple-years of protection, and an analysis of price and information mechanisms. Findings: We analyzed data from 26,883 family planning visits (C = 7605, T1 = 7774, T2 = 5009, T3 = 6495) between August 2022 and May 2023. Providing consumer discounts and provider incentives through a pharmacy-facing intervention increases adoption of DMPA-SC by 14 percentage points (control mean: 0.03), while decreasing use of short-acting methods by 13 percentage points (control mean: 0.92), compared to a control group. Interventions alleviated both price and information barriers to access through a 100% price pass through in the consumer discount arm and an increase in comprehensive counseling by 68 percentage points in the provider-side arms, all compared to the status quo control group. Targeted incentives increase couple-years of protection (CYP) for $2.56-$12.50 per CYP. Interpretation: Pharmacy-based interventions that reduce price and information barriers of DMPA-SC can expand women's contraceptive options, with implications for choosing longer-acting methods. Pharmacies are crucial access points for family planning in Kenya and globally. Understanding how pharmacy-specific interventions influence access to modern methods can generate evidence on this understudied and important care setting. Funding: This study was funded by the Children's Investment Fund Foundation and The Weiss Fund for Research in Development Economics at the University of Chicago. This study was prospectively registered with the AEA registry for randomized controlled trials (AEARCTR-0009020) and is registered with the Pan-African Clinical Trials Network (PACTR202506634961987).

Indexed as

ContraceptivesDigital toolsDMPA-SCFamily planningIncentivesPharmacyProvider decision-making

Identifiers

PMID41816192
PMCPMC12973697

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.