ArticleJournal of family medicine and primary care2026
Estimation of out-of-pocket expenditure and catastrophic health expenditure among households of urban areas of Haryana (India).
Article in Journal of family medicine and primary care, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
15 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: The health system financing of almost all low- and middle-income countries, including India, relies heavily on out-of-pocket (OOP) payments. Out-of-pocket expenditure (OOPE) for patient care has been known to cause maximum impoverishment. It can have debilitating consequences for the urban population or households. It is necessary to study patient care costs and the related factors among the households of an urban area to determine their vulnerability to catastrophic expenditure and to protect them from it. Objective: The objective of the study is to estimate the out-of-pocket and catastrophic health expenditure in the urban population of Rohtak city, Haryana (India). Methodology: This was a cross-sectional study conducted over a period of one year among urban households of District Rohtak, Haryana (India), who have been residing in the study area for at least one year. A sample size of 390 households was selected using simple random sampling. The study proforma as per the National Sample Survey Office (NSSO) was used to elicit and record relevant information. Results: The majority, i.e., 81.8% of households, incurred OOPE while seeking treatment from health facilities. On multiple logistic regression analysis to identify significant determinants like medical insurance, age, chronic disease, duration of stay in hospital, and level of healthcare facility availed of net out-of-pocket (OOP) expenditure incurred on IPD treatment revealed no significant odds for incurring net out-of-pocket (OOP) expenditure ( Conclusion: The majority of households in the study area incurred high OOP health expenditure and only 11.8% were having medical insurance, which highlights the need for active financial protection to bring down the OOP expenditure.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.