ArticleQuantitative imaging in medicine and surgery2026
Developing a segmentation cascade deep learning network based on automated prompts.
Article in Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Accurate auto-segmentation of gross tumor volume in nasopharyngeal carcinoma (GTVnx) remains a significant challenge. This study introduces a novel two-stage deep learning cascade framework designed to address the precision limitations of single-stage models by strategically decoupling coarse localization from boundary refinement, thereby enhancing accuracy while maintaining computational efficiency. Methods: This study developed an end-to-end model comprising a localization prompt generation unit (PGU) and a fine segmentation unit (FSU), integrated via an attention-guided mechanism. Using a dataset of 276 nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) patients, we quantitatively evaluated three prompting strategies within the PGU: prompt-mask, prompt-box, and a dual-prompt combination. Performance was assessed against expert manual contours using the Dice similarity coefficient (DSC), 95% Hausdorff distance (HD95), and mean distance to agreement (MDA). Statistical significance was determined via paired t-tests. Results: The proposed framework achieved state-of-the-art performance. The dual-prompt strategy yielded the most significant improvements over a baseline single-stage model: DSC increased by 9.7% (0.8219 Conclusions: This work presents a computationally efficient, two-stage deep learning-based auto-segmentation (DLAS) framework that significantly improves the accuracy and reliability of GTVnx segmentation. It improves the accuracy and reliability of GTVnx segmentation, features a lightweight architecture and high scalability, and highlights a promising pathway for clinical integration.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.